Navin ([info]mrsgollum) wrote,
@ 2008-03-04 19:20:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current location:home
Current music:Ek ajnabee hasina se - Kishore Kumar
Entry tags:cb series australia, cricket, sachin tendulkar

An opportune cricketing rant..
It's over finally. And in fitting style. A terrific match which at times seemed like Australia's game for the taking ensured that the trophy for the last edition of the CB series shall decorate Indian shelves.

For the last 2 months or so, one would have had to be a zen-like cricket fan not to have got caught in all the drama surrounding the team's tour. And to have it culminate in such a fine victory provides immense pleasure to this cricket fan. I rejoiced a little during the T20 cup win but kept reminding myself that the format could well have been like a poker game where technique, bowlers' reputations and strategy mattered little. Beating Australia in Australia in Tests still is the coup d'etat that almost happened this summer. The feelings most cricket fans had at the end of that series must have been of the kind that say "denied what was due". This CB series win in a tournament which was dear to Australia in so many ways - Gilly and Hogg's farewell, the last edition - does soothe those thoughts.

Before I lose it all in the euphoria, some thoughts on a tour that has thrown up characters out of nowhere :



Praveen Kumar - Good swing bowling on tracks that assisted quicks. The wrist comes into play just as it does for Ishant before the point of delivery. Got a bagful of wickets, courtesy batsmen underestimating his nip and swing. I doubt if he would be as effective on slower tracks. Would be a good find to the team if he improved his batting and proved himself on other tracks.

Ishant Sharma - Here to stay. If Perth was a revelation, the CB series has given the boy something to shout about. Unarguably India's quickest of the lot and one who needs to be groomed and given adequate rest amidst mad-cap touring.

Rohit Sharma - A post has already been devoted to this man. So not much to say except the experience of playing on and adjusting to different tracks needs to happen. Played a divine and crucial knock in the 1st final.

Dhoni as captain - Reads the game well to a T. Maybe it's just me reading a lot of management books, but has anyone noticed how he backs players that are struggling to take up the job in dire circumstances? It seems to be a symptom of the Chappell coaching era to have youngsters rise to the occasion but Dhoni seems to be putting it into practice so well. If it was Joginder Sharma in the T20 cup, it was Ishant, Praveen Kumar and today, a struggling Pathan who was given the last over, who all performed when it mattered. If anything, it seemed like terrific man management and leadership. Batted in an uncharacteristically subdued way but ended up shepherding the team when it mattered. Keeping has seen some amazing improvement as well. Nothing more one could ask from the man.

Pathan - Struggled as a bowler but scored crucial runs as a lower order bat. In his defense, he's probably had to come up or down the order as the situation demanded and does not know his role in advance. Seems short on pace as a bowler.

Harbhajan - A lot of things could have been avoided if he had kept his mouth shut. Having said that, it's too much of an ask from this character. The saving grace has been that he's walked the talk in the CB series getting crucial strikes when it mattered. Is still a bit of a force in the ODI/T20 game considering batsmen are not that defensive. It's time to look to Piyush for Tests.

Yuvraj - A horrid tour to say the least. Looked unfit and out of sorts throughout on seaming pitches and could well have been replaced by Manoj Tiwary during the first 4-5 games. Has tried to hit his way out of trouble and managed limited success. Another successful sub-continent tour and cries for a Test spot will re-surface.

Uthappa - I'd like to think he never got a fair chance to bat and when he did, it was mighty tough to be a Mohammed Kaif at No. 7. Has played well as an opener in patches, but is far from cementing his place in the side. Needs to find form and quick.

Gambhir - Good find for the team. Got a fighting century at Sydney and timely fifties. Plays the spinners well. Could really win a Test spot if he uses right shot selection and does not throw away his wicket when set.

Sreesanth/Munaf - Blown hot, blown cold. Sree looks a promising bowler but tends to lose it under pressure. All that transcendental meditation is not showing up in the performance. Needs a psychologist.

Munaf will probably go down as the worst batsman and fielder who still kept playing for India. Almost seems as if he's out for a stroll in the park when playing. Needs classroom training.



And now, the main reason I even made this post.



Sachin
Has had yet another year enduring question marks on his place and criticism. It seems futile to think that there is anything left to prove for this man.

His efforts in the Tests are already forgotten conveniently. Saw a tired looking version of the man until the finals. Four gruelling Tests and fitness/rest was definitely a concern. Kept playing gamely till he revealed himself in the finals.

Sydney was a scintillating knock and if anything it put to rest a question that refuses to die down : Does Sachin ever play in the finals or during a must-win India chase ?

I ran this question through my mind 5-6 years ago when it really had to be asked and the answer has never been in doubt since. For starters, the question is symptomatic of people who expect a lone hand from the man in India wins. As has often been the case, his best knocks have been outstanding first innings centuries that obliterated oppositions world-wide leading to bowlers having huge totals to bowl at. Aren't these winning knocks?

As far as chases go, people forget it is a team game. The statement "Sachin never plays in a must-win India chase" is as much a statement of Sachin's poor record when chasing as it is of the other 6-7 batsmen in the team who did not play well during these matches. In fact, a more accurate statement would have been "When Sachin does not play well in India's must-win chases, the rest of the batting order also falters". Now, that is as incriminating of the whole Indian team as it is of Sachin. So there.

In any case, these knocks will serve to silence critics for a short time before the novice sports writer writing for the sensationalist newspaper questions this legend's form without an iota of cricketing knowledge. If there's anything left for Sachin, it is to choose his day and time to say goodbye. There is simply nothing left to be done in a glittering 19 year old career when he has simply been an immense source of joy. And yet, being who he is, he might complain of not having beaten Australia at home in Tests.

Thank you, Sachin Tendulkar. Thank you, India.




(15 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]davenchit
2008-03-04 05:06 pm UTC (link)
At times I almost feel that he is admired more (proportionally) outside India than in India. Just look at the way Aussie crowds have given him ovations in every game he's played. Controversies or not, their admiration for him has been untempered by anything base.

It is an interesting point you raise about raising big scores. This is a pretty interesting article. It would be interesting to see how many of those first innings scores were dominated by Tendulkar, and how many we won.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2008-03-05 03:52 am UTC (link)
At times I almost feel that he is admired more (proportionally) outside India than in India.

You might not be wrong on that. To me, Sachin exemplifies the kind of uncomplicated cricketer who's done all that it takes for the game without (well, very rarely maybe) getting involved in stuff that does not concern either his game or the opponent's. That, to me, is the biggest reason why crowds around the world identify and appreciate his greatness - he's played the game without complicating things in his head or the viewer's. And I think the Indian viewer tends to view the game in complicated ways (oneupmanship over political opponents, bringing down loud opponents). All this leads to heavy expectations that tend to dilute one's appreciation of a cricketing great (not just Sachin). We tend to remember the failures associated with wins that we desperately attached ourselves to than the victories that we almost took for granted. Therein lies the problem.

Nice article that. I'll probably put a question on Cricinfo to find what % of games India have won when Sachin has had a 40+ score while batting first. That should be a reasonable estimate of his contribution to 'winning knocks'.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]davenchit
2008-03-05 06:56 am UTC (link)
I think it makes more sense to frame the question in terms of Sachin's *percentage* contribution (40% or more of the team score).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2008-03-05 07:29 am UTC (link)
Hmm..I'd like to agree. But does this mean that a 40 odd in a team score of 300 would not appear as a data point? He'd need to have scored atleast 120 to appear as a contributor. Well, I guess it's winning knocks we are talking about - so yeah that answers my question.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]davenchit
2008-03-05 12:20 pm UTC (link)
40% is probably too high, but 25% and higher looks reasonable.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2008-03-06 11:14 am UTC (link)
He's played some 417 matches since '89. I think this is a task for S. Rajesh or some vella stats chap at Cricinfo. I'll mail them and find out. Among all the stat gizmos on cricinfo's statsguru, I can't seem to find one that links individual score as a % of team score.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]davenchit
2008-03-05 12:22 pm UTC (link)
Subject to caveats about how a relatively small knock can change the course of the game etc. We're speaking d___d lies, here.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2008-03-06 11:17 am UTC (link)
Yeah, for a moment I thought of that Robin Uthappa ODI knock at the Oval - it was a vital 30 odd - that got us to the target.

I guess we'll just have to ignore the few time Sachin scored small but vital runs in relatively big team scores. As a matter of fact, I remember him scoring 40 odd at No. 4 or No. 5 in WI against them while chasing some 200.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]praveenkumarg
2008-03-04 05:49 pm UTC (link)
That was a nice roundup for a good tour.

The youngsters pretty much performed in the series but doesn't mean they would in every series.
Agree with your view on Praveen. He doesn't come across to me as a winner for now even though he's produced brilliant performances in the finals.

May Indian cricket have more of this kind of series.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2008-03-05 03:55 am UTC (link)
Yes, no one gave us a chance to make it to the finals, leave alone win this.
The youngsters definitely proved most cricketing pundits wrong.

Hope we can only go higher from here.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]davenchit
2008-03-05 06:58 am UTC (link)
I don't agree. Most people were writing off Sri Lanka before the series .

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2008-03-05 07:35 am UTC (link)
No way. On paper, the Aussies and SL had a lot more knowns - reputed names - in their lineup compared to the Indians.

Given that Aus were supposed to make the final by default, the Lankans were purported to have a better chance of making it because of

a> having more experience in the ranks
b> being fresher as compared to the bowlers (and some batsmen) in the Indian team.

In retrospect seems that what went against the Lankans was their poor top order form and lack of batting depth. It's been a consistent facet through the series that if you get past Sangakkara, Jayawardane and the openers, the SL tail gives way rather easily.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]davenchit
2008-03-05 07:30 pm UTC (link)
Hmm. Perhaps you're right. Mine was more of a subjective impression based on the Indian media. Which is, of course, famous for its objectivity.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2008-03-06 11:12 am UTC (link)
Heh!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-03-05 08:48 pm UTC (link)
Dhoni is rising like Obama. Too fast.

anshul

(Reply to this)


(15 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…