Navin ([info]mrsgollum) wrote,
@ 2007-01-22 17:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:home
Current music:Sea of Love - Robert Plant

Why are we like babies?
The 1990s were a wonderful time to be an Indian cricket fan. Someone by the name of Sachin Tendulkar had just begun taking apart bowling attacks all over the world. I know this is not exactly breaking news of the trivia kind. However, as a cricket fan following matches on TV, have you ever been frustrated enough to contemplate breaking the TV in the middle of an interesting passage of play in the match ?

If yes, I assume there would have been two plausible reasons for this depressing urge. The first reason would have been that you are plain insane. Considering that your choice of channel, which happens to be the one that plays your favourite saas-bahu soap( a rarity in the '90s, nevertheless a possibility on a local channel), has been vetoed overwhelmingly by the other cricket-crazy members of your household. In which case you decide to smash the TV to smithereens. Which makes you insane for two reasons - you dont watch cricket and you watch saas-bahu operas. In either case, you are insane.

The other,and possibly more realistic reason, which applied for a good part of the 90s is that you were watching the match on Longrange-vision, patriotically titled "Doordarshan" and affectionately abbreviated DD.



In the early 1990s and up until cable television became a more affordable middle-class expense, DD gained much of its viewership in Indian homes by broadcasting cricket matches. Most of these matches were characterised by pathetic TV programming, commentary standards that bordered on the unacceptable and above all, a lax attitude towards the viewer, considering their near-universal dependence on the channel for these matches.

For those who's memory fails them, DD's match coverage was almost always delayed until the first ball was bowled. Pitch reports were unheard of in those days,as were toss or weather reports. There was the omnipresent visage of Narottam Puri hosting everything from cricket to water-polo. Commentary was quite transparent to the point that you could hear backdoor creaks, off-air commentators slurping tea or coughing as well as comments on Kapil Dev's emerging paunch. All this was acceptable as long as you had an uninterrupted view of the match and a mute button to cut out the cacophony.

The frustrating aspects were advertisements. As DD's dominance stayed unthreatened for a good part of that decade, the channel took liberties in inserting more and more ads between overs. Sometimes this happened at the cost of the first 2 deliveries of the over that followed the ad. And at times, the TV producer gambled on critical moments of the game by pandering to the ad-revenue departments. All this and more was Indian cricket on TV up until Star and other channels brought in professional sports broadcasting standards to the Indian viewer. Prasar Bharati awoke. Indian cricket had just left its building.

So why am I saying all this? Because, we may just go back to the stone ages of Indian cricket viewership with this development here.

What is happening here ,if bluntly put,is arm-twisting of the communist kind. Not to mention that Prasar Bharti puts in virtually zero investment in buying rights from organisers/cricket board for TV rights. Nimbus invests in broadcast equipment,infrastructure,commentary teams and TV rights and is expected to part with TV rights,ad-revenues without regret.

The funniest gem in this whole saga emerged here :
"They [Nimbus] have a very unpatriotic attitude," Priya Ranjan Dasmunshi, the Information and Broadcasting (I&B) Minister, told The Times of India. "Since they do not want to share feed, I will bring in a legislation in the next cabinet [meeting]," he said. "

Well here's the take, Mr. Dasmunshi. I cannot imagine how you do not have the money to pay for the matches and expect the investors concerned to part with their rights. This is business and sadly, DD and Prasar Bharti have never ever stepped up to the plate in all these years. How long can the government hope to piggy-back on private channels and arm-twist them to make money in the name of providing free sports entertainment to the viewer?

Sometimes, one feels that this is but a symptom of a much larger and universal disease in the Indian psyche - that of free-lunches, largesses demanded by crying like a baby deprived of candy, and one that sends a negative message to overseas channels/sports telecasters who infact have contributed to the overall improvement of broadcasting standards throughout the country. The government's move to black-out channels that have paid for and refuse to share feed that is rightfully theirs is a regressive step in an era where we are trying to bring the best in entertainment (sports and otherwise) into Indian homes.

Wake up DD. Wake up Prasar Bharti, or simply lay low till you realise that the candy was never yours for the taking.




(Post a new comment)


[info]jayasankarvs
2007-01-22 02:05 pm UTC (link)
Call me a romantic, but I clicked on the lj-cut.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-22 02:23 pm UTC (link)
but I clicked on the lj-cut.

and were you disappointed?

on a serious note, Prasar Bharti's arm-twisting business borders on the shameless. They demand without remorse or even so much as an iota of self-esteem. As the issue stands now, they'll have nothing short of a 50-50 ad revenue share plus free feed from Nimbus and are willing to move legislature to make this possible. Worse, the I&B ministry patronises the babies that run Prasar Bharti.

Such blatant bullying just does not irritate me, it scares me as to where we head as a nation. And some people tell me,it's just a game.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ga_woo
2007-01-22 03:47 pm UTC (link)
And some people tell me,it's just a game.

Doesn't that it's only a game make this all the more ridiculous? I wouldn't find them this arrogant if this was some basic amenities issue they were sticking their dicks in.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-22 04:07 pm UTC (link)
Doesn't that it's only a game make this all the more ridiculous

considering the money involved, it aint that ridiculous, which is why they are sticking their things in so deep.

The kind of self-importance that accompanies their bullying can get to you, esp. when they state they are doing this in public interest, while they are actually after the money in ad-revenue.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]davenchit
2007-01-22 04:22 pm UTC (link)
Dude, somebody's not making enough money in Prasar Bharati. This is serious.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ga_woo
2007-01-22 04:48 pm UTC (link)
I'm saying it's a ridiculous claim to make: That we need free cricket telecasts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]davenchit
2007-01-23 05:10 am UTC (link)
I know what you were saying and I agree. I was just being sarcastic about Prasar Bharati's claimed motive and their true motive.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]vijucat
2007-01-23 03:19 pm UTC (link)
...as I have been told vonly 2 times this week, "In India, cricket is a religion".

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]ga_woo
2007-01-23 03:24 pm UTC (link)
Now it's EVEN more ridiculous. I've wanted a uniform civil code before any of this cricket-broadcast-madness started :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]vijucat
2007-01-23 03:44 pm UTC (link)
Fuck, now I have to read Wikipedia to understand the joke about uniform civil code and cricket-broadcast-madness and give an educated and cool reply. You just too ejucated, man.

(But the good thing is that you're a Perfect Example of how access to the Internets can give any curious person the ultimate self-education. My future children shall henceforth be home schooled <-- lazy evaluation since children are in the future.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]ga_woo
2007-01-23 04:21 pm UTC (link)
Although Uniform Civil Code is from reading The Hindu when I was home for a year doing nothing else but watch TV and masturbate, that I am Internet-ejucated is sadly the truth. How is it obvious? (And LOL, btw. I'm not going to type LOL each time for your comments. Just assume I LOLed a lot. Thanks)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-24 04:53 am UTC (link)
some mutual admiration society this is:)..wish someone could call me ejucated too:)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-24 04:46 am UTC (link)
I've wanted a uniform civil code

it does not apply to communists,you know..all they know is the greater common good or the common greater good - in whatever order it suits them

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]davenchit
2007-01-23 03:24 pm UTC (link)
And religion= Big Money. Just think Tirupati.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]vijucat
2007-01-23 03:39 pm UTC (link)
Now you've got me thinking. What do they *do* with all that moolah?

Incidentally, my retort to 'cricket is a religion' is : 'Where's the match-fixing hundi for thine Gods?'

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]davenchit
2007-01-23 04:12 pm UTC (link)
>Where's the match-fixing hundi for thine Gods?'

In Switzerland.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-24 04:51 am UTC (link)
in Vaikuntha..:)

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-24 04:48 am UTC (link)
Just think Tirupati

there used to be a time when they used to say..if allopathy fails,homeopathy fails,all you have is Venkatachalapathy..i think Venkatachala left the house and all we have now is apathy:)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]davenchit
2007-01-24 03:13 pm UTC (link)
Heh. Venkata chala gayaa. Apathy reh gayee.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: Butt, and a big butt it is,...
[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-24 04:45 am UTC (link)
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<butt,and>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

<Butt,and a big butt it is..</i>

:)..and who is the great commentator who talks so a(ss)tractively?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jayasankarvs
2007-01-23 12:25 pm UTC (link)
And those fucked-up-Hindi-commentating-fucktards! And those fucking commercial breaks.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-24 04:50 am UTC (link)
I agree..we should seriously consider floating a Dravidian-ideology based party to oust Hindi from cricket commentary for good.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]davenchit
2007-01-22 04:15 pm UTC (link)
>that of free-lunches, largesses demanded by crying like a baby deprived of candy,

Spot on. And good post.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-23 08:17 am UTC (link)
thanks..have been waiting quite a while to let out all that pent-up DD frustration..the snobs that they are, Prasar Bharti has just got used to throwing around their weight courtesy govt backing, which is why DD is in the state that it is today.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fugney
2007-01-22 06:33 pm UTC (link)
Sometimes, one feels that this is but a symptom of a much larger and universal disease in the Indian psyche - that of free-lunches, largesses.....

Dude. It's cricket. People just act crazy.

Sharing is a good idea, but let a third part operate the cameras.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fugney
2007-01-22 06:35 pm UTC (link)
"third party"

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-23 08:21 am UTC (link)
Dude. It's cricket. People just act crazy

I still dont get how the govt can step in and make a ruling that it is mandatory for private broadcasters to share feed with terrestrial operators like DD. In addition, how can ad-revenue be shared if you have paid 20 crore odd to get TV rights to an event and then end up sharing feed and ad-revenue both - am quite sure this is sending out quite the wrong message to overseas broadcasters that no matter how much you pay, you'll need to play by the local goon's rules!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-23 08:24 am UTC (link)
am not sure about third party operators because the BCCI sells broadcast rights to the highest bidder as of the current scheme(something in itself which might be open to debate).

having said that, the highest bidder ensures telecast infrastructure,and ability for cable distributors to route the channel concerned to viewers. Shared feed can only mean one thing that we have more parties in the bargain which may further confuse share holder stakes. Also, there is no constant third party who volunteers to broadcast all matches - simply because BCCI regimes keep changing and hence come up with different(and innovatively frustrating) ways of deciding which channel grabs TV rights.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]davenchit
2007-01-23 09:21 am UTC (link)
The handout culture is deeply ingrained in us. It isn't just about cricket. Of course, there is the other issue of the government deciding what is good for us.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]rileen
2007-01-22 07:22 pm UTC (link)
Very contrived comment on watchers of Saas-Bahu operas :-)

Why do you think we'll go back to the "stone ages of Indian cricket viewership" ? You really think Star and others would withdraw completely if forced to share? I doubt that - a smaller share of a huge pie might still be far better than no share.

And i think reaching right into "the Indian psyche" is reading a bit too much into the issue - it is simply people in power trying to make money. I don't think the sweeping generalization is very justified.

I seem to be in an argumentative mode - time to go home :-p

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-23 08:32 am UTC (link)
Very contrived comment on watchers of Saas-Bahu operas :-)

so you noticed:)..glad

You really think Star and others would withdraw completely if forced to share? I doubt that - a smaller share of a huge pie might still be far better than no share.

no, they might not withdraw, but at the end of the day, it has to be lucrative for a broadcaster to the point of being able to get enough revenue to justify the costs. If the channel ends up profitting from a broadcast, the profits are rightfull theirs by virtue of them being the highest bidder for the rights. Why then should they share their pie? The entire issue is about a local party that gets a fixed share of the pie by virtue of being a government stakeholding - simply unfair in my opinion, considering DD has virtually no role or limited role in the whole telecast process.

And i think reaching right into "the Indian psyche" is reading a bit too much into the issue - it is simply people in power trying to make money. I don't think the sweeping generalization is very justified.

Maybe not. I guess calling it an Indian malady is true to the extent that we see the same symptoms being exemplified in babudom in different government undertakings. A local party has been the sitting incumbent for years, grabbing a fair share of the pie without justifying it in terms of efforts towards creation of that revenue. Much of the Indian structure is so centralized that states like Bihar,West Bengal or even MP,Rajasthan contribute a very minimal % of the national GDP, yet they get as much if not more assistance from the centre than other prosperous states such as TN,Punjab,Gujarat.

The point I am trying to make is the government structure and the history of the feudal system in our land shows up at various levels in the heirarchy, DD and Prasar Bharati are minor symptoms of a much larger disease.






(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rileen
2007-01-23 09:39 am UTC (link)
Of course it is unfair - i was never questioning that. However, no broadcaster is going to leave the market "on principle" :-)

I see your point better now, but still disagree over the term "Indian psyche".

The idea of using contribution to the national GDP to determine the extent of assistance from the centre is an interesting idea - i wonder how it would go in practise. Perhaps we'd get a lot of "local Singapores" :-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-23 10:22 am UTC (link)
However, no broadcaster is going to leave the market "on principle" :-)

true, but they might definitely consider cutting down on doing business within the Indian system. Overall, we might see a general level of low standards of broadcasting in the nation. As long as we are unable to create an environment conducive to competitive broadcasting, which in effect can follow only by awarding rights to the best as also financially capable broadcaster, we may not see TV standards rising.

I see your point better now, but still disagree over the term "Indian psyche".

point taken:)..I think it was more of my frustration talking than anything else. I see a lot of this reflected in people's behaviour around me everyday:)

i wonder how it would go in practise. Perhaps we'd get a lot of "local Singapores" :-)

am no economist, but the idea has worked before. More independence and competition ensures each state working towards making its own environment conducive to being a better place to live and work in. This in turn can only reflect on the general economic health of the nation.
Centralisation is good within limits, however it has created the practice of a few states in India shouldering the nation's responsibilities.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rileen
2007-01-23 10:30 am UTC (link)
I think that's a possible but worst-case scenario - let's see how it plays out. For now, there seems to be the possibility of a 7-minute delayed feed on DD.

am no economist, but the idea has worked before.

Sure - it sounds good in principle. In practise, India is usually a new scale for any national experiment :-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]vijucat
2007-01-23 03:26 pm UTC (link)
"They [Nimbus] have a very unpatriotic attitude. Since they do not want to share feed, I will bring in a legislation in the next cabinet."

Classic one!

Unpatriotic me also remembers that all the DD news readers got old and were replaced except One. The One That Shed Tears As She Announced The Death of Indira Gandhi. Yessir! Her voice cracked, and cracked, and cracked. But she was Patriotic, while young you and me were probably reaching Archie (or worse, Mad) while Mrs. Gandhi died. We shall not get the loverly chance of reading the news at 9 on DD till we die, oh no.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]vijucat
2007-01-23 03:37 pm UTC (link)
Salma Sultan. That was the lady. Now I remember.

(Though it was Usha Alburqueque who was the stuff of my fantasies. My English teacher, or if that didn't jell for some reason (such as the fact that she had a kid in 2nd grade in the same school), Usha A.)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mrsgollum
2007-01-24 04:59 am UTC (link)
oh yes, Salma Sultan.blast from the past. for lack of idols, some of these women became late-night celebrities..there was another one called Meenu I think.

I knew we were not watching news but a soap opera when I heard my mom and grandmother discussing how Meenu's makeup does not look all that good today or how she seems to have put on weight after her baby.(gosh! can you tell me who their sources are - following newsreaders' lives has to be the heights of life's futility!)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…